cyberspaceФилософские проблемы информационных технологий и киберпространстваPhilosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C)2305-3763Пятигорский государственный университетcyberspace-130Research ArticleСОВРЕМЕННЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ЛОГИКИ И КОГНИТИВНЫХ НАУКМозговые, мыслительные и языковые функциональные структурыФингелькертЭ. А.noemail@neicon.ruФингелькертА. А.noemail@neicon.ruМарчеттиДж. ..noemail@neicon.ruBM-Science - Центр научных технологий в области изучения мозга и психикиRussian FederationУрбинский университетRussian Federation201208072021021727Copyright © Фингелькерт Э.А., Фингелькерт А.А., Марчетти Д..., 20212021Фингелькерт Э.А., Фингелькерт А.А., Марчетти Д...Фингелькерт Э.А., Фингелькерт А.А., Марчетти Д...Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://cyberspace.pgu.ru/jour/article/view/130

Взаимодействию между мозгом и языком посвящено значительное количество исследований и различных подходов, которые, однако, не предлагают всесторонней и единообразной теоретической системы взглядов и анализа того, как функционирование мозга представляет интеллектуальные процессы, участвующие в формировании языка и понимании речи. Эта особая проблема обращает внимание на необходимость развить широкую теоретическую систему взглядов посредством стимулирования взаимодействия между различными научными дисциплинами и методологиями, центрами по изучению мозга, мышления и языка, и параллельно сформулировать следующие основные направления исследования: (а) Язык как регулирующая форма мозговых и ментальных процессов; (б) Язык как уникальный человеческий феномен; (в) Язык как средство управления человеческим поведением и мозговыми процессами; (г) Язык как организационный фактор онтогенеза мыслительных и поведенческих процессов.

The interactionbetweenbrain and language has been investigated by a vast amount of research and different approaches, which however do not offer a comprehensive and unified theoretical framework to analyze how brain functioning performs the mental processes we use in producing language and in understanding speech. This Special Issue addresses the need to develop such a general theoretical framework, by fostering an interaction among the various scientific disciplines and methodologies, which centres on investigating the functional architecture of brain, mind and language, and is articulated along the following main dimensions of research: (a) Language as a regulatory contour of brain and mental processes; (b) Language as a unique human phenomenon; (c) Language as a governor of human behaviour and brain operations; (d) Language as an organizational factor of ontogenesis of mentation and behaviour.

ментальные категориисознаниелингвистическое мышлениеязыквниманиемыслительные операцииучастки мозгакогнитивные процессыMental categoriesconsciousnesslinguistic thoughtlanguageattentionmental operationsbrain areascognitionReferencesLuria A.R. The Making of Mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1979a.Luria A.R. The Making of Mind: A Personal Account of Soviet Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1979a.Mehler J, Nespor M, Shukla M, Pea M. Why is language unique to humans? In Proceeding of Novartis Foundation Symposium 270: Percept, decision, action: bridging the gaps. Chichester: Wiley 2005; pp. 251-284.Mehler J, Nespor M, Shukla M, Pea M. Why is language unique to humans? In Proceeding of Novartis Foundation Symposium 270: Percept, decision, action: bridging the gaps. Chichester: Wiley 2005; pp. 251-284.Pulvermller F. The Neuroscience of Language. On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.Pulvermller F. The Neuroscience of Language. On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6: 78-84.Friederici A.D. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2002; 6: 78-84.Baggio G, Van Lambalgen M, Hagoort P. Language, Linguistics, and Cognition. In: Stokhof M, Groenendijk J, Eds. Handbook of Philosophy of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier in press.Baggio G, Van Lambalgen M, Hagoort P. Language, Linguistics, and Cognition. In: Stokhof M, Groenendijk J, Eds. Handbook of Philosophy of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier in press.Hagoort P, van Berkum J. Beyond the sentence given. Phil Trans R Soc B: BiolSci 2007; 362: 801-11.Hagoort P, van Berkum J. Beyond the sentence given. Phil Trans R Soc B: BiolSci 2007; 362: 801-11.Stowe L.A, Haverkort M, Zwarts F. Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua 2005; 115: 997-1042.Stowe L.A, Haverkort M, Zwarts F. Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua 2005; 115: 997-1042.Luria A.R. Language and Consciousness. Moscow: Nauka 1979b.Luria A.R. Language and Consciousness. Moscow: Nauka 1979b.Vygotsky L.S. The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky - Vol. 6. Scientific Legacy. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999.Vygotsky L.S. The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky - Vol. 6. Scientific Legacy. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999.Ukhtomsky A.A. The Dominant. Moscow-Leningrad: Nauka, 1966.Ukhtomsky A.A. The Dominant. Moscow-Leningrad: Nauka, 1966.Majid A, Bowerman M, Kita S, Haun D.B.M., Levinson S.C. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8:108-14.Majid A, Bowerman M, Kita S, Haun D.B.M., Levinson S.C. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8:108-14.Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press 2000.Talmy L. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press 2000.Kobayashi C, Glover G.H, Temple E. Switching language switches mind: linguistic effects on developmental neural bases of "Theory of Mind'. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2008; 3: 62-70.Kobayashi C, Glover G.H, Temple E. Switching language switches mind: linguistic effects on developmental neural bases of "Theory of Mind'. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2008; 3: 62-70.Sakai KS, Homae F, Hashimoto R. Sentence processing is uniquely human. Neurosci Res 2003; 46: 273-9.Sakai KS, Homae F, Hashimoto R. Sentence processing is uniquely human. Neurosci Res 2003; 46: 273-9.Vygotsky L.S. The history of the development of high mental functions. Development of the higher mental functions. In: Leontiev A, Luria A, Smirnov A, Eds. Psychological Research in the USSR. Moscow: Progress Publishers 1982; vol. 2: pp. 361-366.Vygotsky L.S. The history of the development of high mental functions. Development of the higher mental functions. In: Leontiev A, Luria A, Smirnov A, Eds. Psychological Research in the USSR. Moscow: Progress Publishers 1982; vol. 2: pp. 361-366.Pavlova L.P, Romanenko A.F. Systemic Approach to Psychophysiological Investigation of Human Brain. Leningrad: Nauka, 1988.Pavlova L.P, Romanenko A.F. Systemic Approach to Psychophysiological Investigation of Human Brain. Leningrad: Nauka, 1988.Premack D. Language in chimpanzee? Science 1971; 172: 808-22.Premack D. Language in chimpanzee? Science 1971; 172: 808-22.Premack D. Gavagai! Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books 1986.Premack D. Gavagai! Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books 1986.Terrace H.S. Nim: A Chimpanzee Who Learned Sign Language. New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1980.Terrace H.S. Nim: A Chimpanzee Who Learned Sign Language. New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1980.Miller G.A. The Psychology of Communication. New York: Basic 1967.Miller G.A. The Psychology of Communication. New York: Basic 1967.Tihomirov O.K. Psychology of Thinking. Moscow: Nauka 1984.Tihomirov O.K. Psychology of Thinking. Moscow: Nauka 1984.Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M. Language and Motor Control 2000; 133: 468-90Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M. Language and Motor Control 2000; 133: 468-90Zivin G. Removing common confusions about egocentric speech, private speech, and self-regulation. In: Zivin G, Ed. The Development of Selfregulation Through Private Speech. New York: Wiley 1979Zivin G. Removing common confusions about egocentric speech, private speech, and self-regulation. In: Zivin G, Ed. The Development of Selfregulation Through Private Speech. New York: Wiley 1979Harris K.R. Developing self-regulated learners: the role of private speech and self-instructions. Educ Psychol 1990; 25: 35-49.Harris K.R. Developing self-regulated learners: the role of private speech and self-instructions. Educ Psychol 1990; 25: 35-49.Roberts R.N. Private speech in academic problem-solving: A naturalistic perspective. In: Zivin G, Ed. The Development of Self-regulation Through Private Speech. New York: Wiley 1979.Roberts R.N. Private speech in academic problem-solving: A naturalistic perspective. In: Zivin G, Ed. The Development of Self-regulation Through Private Speech. New York: Wiley 1979.Meacham J.A. The role of verbal activity in remembering the goals of actions. In: Zivin G, Ed. The Development of Self-regulation Through Private Speech. New York: Wiley 1979.Meacham J.A. The role of verbal activity in remembering the goals of actions. In: Zivin G, Ed. The Development of Self-regulation Through Private Speech. New York: Wiley 1979.Sokolov A.N. Inner Speech and Thought. New York: Plenum Press 1972.Sokolov A.N. Inner Speech and Thought. New York: Plenum Press 1972.Beazley M.B, Glass C.R, Chambless D.L, Arnkoff D.B. Cognitive selfstatements in social phobias: a comparison across three types of social situations. Cognit Ther Res 2001; 25: 781-99.Beazley M.B, Glass C.R, Chambless D.L, Arnkoff D.B. Cognitive selfstatements in social phobias: a comparison across three types of social situations. Cognit Ther Res 2001; 25: 781-99.Kendall P. C, Hollon S.D. Assessment Strategies for Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions. New York: Academic Press 1981.Kendall P. C, Hollon S.D. Assessment Strategies for Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions. New York: Academic Press 1981.Glenberg A.M, Kaschak M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychono Bull Rev 2002; 9(3): 558-65.Glenberg A.M, Kaschak M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychono Bull Rev 2002; 9(3): 558-65.Pavlov I.P. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1927/1960.Pavlov I.P. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1927/1960.Behtereva N.P. Healthy and 111 Brain of Human. Moscow: Nauka 1988.Behtereva N.P. Healthy and 111 Brain of Human. Moscow: Nauka 1988.Leontiev A.A. The Word in Speech Activity. Moscow: Nauka 1965.Leontiev A.A. The Word in Speech Activity. Moscow: Nauka 1965.Bournot-Trites M., Jarman R.F, Das J.P. Luria's language theory within a cognitive theory: a Canadian perspective. Aphasiology 1995: 9: 123-35.Bournot-Trites M., Jarman R.F, Das J.P. Luria's language theory within a cognitive theory: a Canadian perspective. Aphasiology 1995: 9: 123-35.Klima E.S, Bellugi U. The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni Press 1979.Klima E.S, Bellugi U. The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni Press 1979.Landau В., Gleitman L.R. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1985.Landau В., Gleitman L.R. Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1985.Mehler J, Jusczyk P, Lambertz G, Halsted N, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C.A precursor oflanguage acquisition in young infants. Cognition 1988; 29: 143-78.Mehler J, Jusczyk P, Lambertz G, Halsted N, Bertoncini J, Amiel-Tison C.A precursor oflanguage acquisition in young infants. Cognition 1988; 29: 143-78.Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dehaene S, Hertz-Pannier L. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science 2002; 298: 2013-5.Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dehaene S, Hertz-Pannier L. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science 2002; 298: 2013-5.MehlerJ, NesporM, ShuklaM, PeaM. Why is language unique to humans? In Proceeding of Novartis Foundation Symposium 270: Percept, decision, action: bridging the gaps. Chichester: Wiley 2005; pp. 251-284.MehlerJ, NesporM, ShuklaM, PeaM. Why is language unique to humans? In Proceeding of Novartis Foundation Symposium 270: Percept, decision, action: bridging the gaps. Chichester: Wiley 2005; pp. 251-284.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.