PHILOSOPHICAL FICTIONALISM AND PROBLEM OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2015.10.2.811.93
Abstract
Interpretation of artificial intelligence on the base of the philosophical fictionalism allowed discussing the educational technologies in the context of conditions for strengthening of discursive power of pupils’ thought. The artificial intelligence received broad interpretation as an embodiment of a literary image, which did not have unambiguous link with the area of logical formalisms and mathematical algorithms of action and communication. The author applied the methods peculiar to the semiotics approach, offered by Boris Uspensky and Yury Lotman. It was succeeded to criticize the modern versions of educational technologies conducting to giving of absolute value for information and telecommunication technologies. Growth of pupils’ methodological culture, described on the base of functional approach to word formation of new means for the description of the studied subjects, was related to the development of discursive power of thought. As a result, the research opened new prospects in understanding of a place and role of artificial intelligence within educational practice.
References
1. Vaihinger H. The Philosophy of ‘As if’: A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind. Eastford: Martino Fine Books, 2009
2. Salis F. Fictional Reports. A Study on the Semantics of Fictional Names // Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia. 2010. Vol. 25. No. 68. - P. 175-185.
3. Соколов А.В. Информатические опусы. Опус 5. Природа и сущность информации // Научные и технические библиотеки [Informatics opuses. Opus 5. Nature and essence of information]. 2011. No. 2. С. 5-27.
4. Steel S. Recovering Ancient and Medieval Contemplative Taxonomies as an Alternative to Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives // Paideusis. 2012. Vol. 20. No. 2. - P. 46-56.
5. Cronbach L.J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology // American Psychologist. 1957. Vol. 12. - P. 671-684.
6. Hunt E. Human Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2010. - 524 p.
7. Hsu F.-H. Behind Deep Blue - Building the Computer that Defeated the World Chess Champion. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. - 320 p.
8. Kripke S. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980. - 172 p.
9. Rorty R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1979. - 401 p.
10. Peirce C.S. Necessity, The Doctrine of-Examined // Monist. 1891/1892. Vol. 2. - P. 321-337.
11. Ewald W.B. (ed.) From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics: in two volumes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. - 650 p.
12. Gödel K. On Formally Undecidable Propositions of Principia Mathematica and Related Systems. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1992. - 72 p.
13. Austin J.L. How to do Things with Words. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975. - 192 p.
14. Kotthoff L. Algorithm Selection for Combinatorial Search Problems: A Survey // AI Magazine. 2014. Vol. 35. No. 3. - P. 48-60.
15. Лотман Ю.М., Успенский Б.А. О семиотическом механизме культуры // Лотман Ю.М. Избранные статьи: в 3 т. Таллинн: Александра, 1992-93. Т. 3. - С. 326-344.
16. Резанова З.И. Функциональный аспект словообразования: Русское производное имя. Томск: Изд-во Том. ун-та, 1996. - 219 с
Review
For citations:
Kulikov S.B. PHILOSOPHICAL FICTIONALISM AND PROBLEM OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Philosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C). 2015;(2):42-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2015.10.2.811.93
Views:
179
Email this article 