Blurring the line between publicity and privacy on social media and the privacy paradox
https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2021.2.2
Abstract
The article examines the situation associated with the spread of social networks, which brought not only new communication opportunities, but also the risks of blurring the boundaries between privacy and publicity. People voluntarily share personal data in exchange for public acceptance. This information is recorded and studied by various government and commercial institutions. The danger to information privacy as a right to control access to personal information is aggravated by the peculiarities of online communication, which is characterized by “context collapse”: the merging of different audiences with different norms and values. Content posted on social media is searchable beyond a specific point in time and situation. If offline communication involves a foreseeable number of interlocutors, there is an “invisible audience” on social networks, which leads to information asymmetry. However, despite the fact that most users are aware of the potential dangers of privacy breaches, they share personal information on social networks. This phenomenon is called the privacy paradox. The reasons for this behavior are a lack of technical and social skills, a reluctance to spend time and energy on measures to minimize risks, a desire to have wide social connections and skepticism about the effectiveness of the efforts being made. The behavior of users on social networks is influenced primarily by factors such as age and education. The most concerned about the preservation of privacy are young people and middle-aged people, as they have to manage the most complex social relations.
About the Author
L. V. ChesnokovaRussian Federation
Chesnokova Lesya V., Senior lecturer, PhD in Philosophy
Omsk
References
1. Prentki J. V. Die anthropologische Funktion der Privatheit. – Norderstedt: GRIN, 2016. – 10 S.
2. Goffman E. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. – M.: Smysl, 2009. – 319 p.
3. Fedyaev D. M., Chinakova L. I. Dialectics of the border: common in different versions // Modern problems of science and education. – 2012. – No. 3. URL: https://www.scienceeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=6220.
4. Drosdova A. V. The Dichotomy of Public/Private in the New Media Space // Changing Societies & Personalities. – 2020. – Vol. 4. – P. 441-456. DOI: 10.15826/csp.2020.4.4.110.
5. Krongaus M. A. Public intimacy // Znamya. – 2009. – № 12. URL: magazines.russ.ru/znamia/2009/12/kr10.html.
6. Pronkina E. S. The privacy paradox: why users of social media disclose personal information in public space // RGGU Bulletin. “History, Philology, Cultural Studies, Oriental Studies” Series. – 2018. – № 8(41). – P. 155-165.
7. Kravchenko I. I. New Philosophical Encyklopedia. – M.: Mysl’, 2001. URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/8928.
8. Rössler B. Autonomie. Ein Versuch über das gelungene Leben. – Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2018. – 442 S.
9. Davis J. Context Collapse: A Literature Review // Cyborgology. – 2013. January 10. URL: https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2013/01/10/context-collapse-a-literature-review (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
10. Vitak J. The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures // Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2012. – No. 56(4). – P. 451-470. DOI: 10.1080/08838151.2012.732140.
11. Polyakova V., Fursov K. Are Runet users ready to share personal data? URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/450602433.html.
12. Barnes S. B. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States // First Monday. – 2006. – Vol. 11. № 9. – 4 Sept. URL: http://first-monday.org/article/view/1394/1312 (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
13. Haggitai E., Marwick A. «What Can I really Do?»: Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathie // International Journal of Communication. 2016. – No. 10. – P. 3737-3757. URL: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/148157/1/HargittaiMarwickPrivacyApathyFinal.pdf (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
14. Barth S., Jong de M. The privacy paradox – Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy and actual online behavior // Telematics and Informatics. – 2017. – Vol. 34. Iss. 7. – P. 1038-1058. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585317302022 (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
15. Blank G., Bolsover G., Dubois E. A New Privacy Paradox: Young People and Privacy on Social Network Sites // SSRN Electronic Journal. 2014. – April. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2479938 (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
16. Taddicken M. The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure // Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. – 2014. – № 19(2). – С. 248-273. DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12052. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcc4.12052 (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
Review
For citations:
Chesnokova L.V. Blurring the line between publicity and privacy on social media and the privacy paradox. Philosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C). 2021;(2):22-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2021.2.2