Evolution of the display of high technologies and social networks in the «terminator» universe in 1984-2022
https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2022.2.3
Abstract
The article is devoted to a comprehensive analysis of the transformation of the reflection of computer technologies and network resources in the Terminator cinematic and literary universe created by the American director J. Cameron in the mid 1980s and early 2020s. In this study the authors substantiate the relevance and scientific component of the problem under study. The paper considers the degree of importance of high technologies and social networks in modern public life. The article provides a justification for the fallacy of the judgment, according to which works of fiction of a fantastic orientation perform purely entertaining function and do not carry a significant semantic load. This article also provides an argument for choosing the Terminator fantastic universe as an example for research, wit an analysis of the reasons for its great popularity and high degree of significance for contemporary art. The authors of the work subject the key components of the topic under consideration to reflection, taking into account the changes that have taken place in the public consciousness over three and a half decades, takin inti account the differences in historical and political realities – from the last quarter of the 20-th century to the present, until the beginning of the third decade of the XXI century. This article provides a comparative analysis of the reasons for significant differences in the display of high technology and online resources in cinema and fiction. The work draws parallels and analogies with historical events, analyzes the use of the religious meanings used in the Terminator universe. The authors of the article analyze the moral issues that are raised by the creators of the fantastic universe of Terminator in the context of the positive and negative consequences of the intense growth of the role of high technologies and communicative Internet sites in the life of human society.
About the Authors
K. V. KasparyanRussian Federation
Kasparyan Konstantin Viktorovich - PhD (History), associate professor, Department of Historical and Socio-Philosophical Disciplines
M. V. Rutkovskaya
Russian Federation
Rutkovskaya Marina Valeryevna - PhD (Philosophy), associate professor, Department of Historical, Socio-Philosophical Disciplines, Oriental Studies and Theology
A. S. Linets
Russian Federation
Linets Alexander Sergeevich - PhD (History), associate professor, Department of Historical and Socio-Philosophical Disciplines, Oriental Studies and Theology
References
1. Joel M. Terminator novel birth, life, and being me, as investigator on a mission to kill the wrong doers. – New-York: Tor Books, 2017. – 257 p.
2. Irwine I. Terminator Gene. In a drowning world who will stay afloat? – Washington: Ian Irvine, 2008. – 475 p.
3. Miller K. Terminator: Genesys. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021. – 328 p.
4. Mason L. The Terminator Trivia How well do you know about The Terminator. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022. – 172 p.
5. Cox G. Terminator Salvation: Cold war. – Detroyit: The University of Michigan Press, 2010. – 384 p.
6. Hagberg D. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines. – New-York: Tor Books, 2013. – 318 p.
7. Halcomb D. Will it be back? The Rise and Fall of Terminator. – Detroyit: The University of Michigan Press, 2020. – 112 p.
8. French S. The Terminator: BFI Film Classics. – Detroyit: The University of Michigan Press, 2021. – 81 p.
9. Баева Л. В. Образ киберчеловека в современной науке и культуре // Философские проблемы информационных технологий и киберпространства. – 2015. – № 1(9). – С. 56-69. (Baeva L. V. The image of a cyberman in modern science and culture // Filosofskie problem informatsionnykh tekhnologiy i kiberprostarnstva. – 2015. – № 1(9). – S. 56-69.)
10. Гощило Е., Гощило Б. Выцветание красного: бывший враг времен холодной войны в русском и американском кино 1990-2005 годов. – СПб.: Academic Studies Press, 2020. – 480 c. (Goshilo H., Goshilo B. Fade from Red. The Cold War Ex-Enemy in Russian and American Film 1990-2005. – SPb: Academic Studies Press, 2020. – 480 c.)
11. Маткин А. В. Фантастическое как метод построения кинематографических вымышленных вселенных // Социология. – 2018. – № 3. – С. 227-233. (Matkin A. V. Fantastic as a method of constructing cinematic fictional universes // Sotsiologia. – 2018. – № 3. – S. 227-233.)
12. Чеснова Е. Н., Мансурова Ш. И., Снытина А. А. Философия миров постапокалипсиса в современной культуре // Гуманитарные новости ТГПУ им. Л. Н. Толстого. – 2017. – № 2 (22). – С. 46-54. (Chesnova E. N., Mansurova Sh. I., Snitina A. A. Philosophy of the postapocalypse worlds in modern culture // Gumanitarnye novosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo. – 2017. – № 2 (22). – S. 46-54.)
13. Березовская Л. С., Демченков С. А. Постапокалиптика как жанр научной/паранаучной фантастики // Гуманитарные исследования. – 2016. – № 4 (13). – С. 64-67. (Berezovskaya L. S., Demchenkov S. A. Post-Apocalyptic as a genre of science/science fiction // Gumanitarnye issledovanija. – 2016. – № 4 (13). – S. 64-67.)
14. Окавка Л. Б. Социальный статус кино как феномена художественной культуры // Гуманитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке. – 2021. – № 1. – С. 94-100. (Okavka L. B. The social status of cinema as a phenomenon of artistic culture // Gumanitarnye issledovanija v Vostochnoj Sibiri i na Dal’nem Vostoke. – 2021. – № 1. – S. 94-100.)
15. Луков В. А. Оценки молодежи неперспективных трансгуманистических технологий изменения человека // Знание. Понимание. Умение. – 2016. – № 4. – С. 115-123. (Lukov V. A. Young people’s assessments of unpromising transhumanistic technologies of human change // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. – 2016. – № 4. – S. 115- 123.); Луков В. А. Трансгуманизм // Entsiklopediya gumanitarnykh nauk. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 245-252. (Lukov V. A. Transhumanism // Encyclopedia of Humanities. – 2017. – № 1. – S. 245-252.)
16. Разлогов К. Э. Утопия и антиутопия в мировом кинематографе // Международный журнал исследований культуры. – 2009. – № 4 (9). – С. 112-115. (Razlogov K. E. Utopia and dystopia in world cinema // Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovanij kul’tury. – 2009. – № 4 (9). – S. 112-115.)
17. Афанасьев А. Н. Дети Интернета. Что они смотрят и кто ими управляет? – М.: Наше Завтра, 2021. – 314 c. (Afanasiev A. N. Children of the Internet. What are they watching and who controls them? – M.: Nashe Zavtra, 2021. – 314 c.)
18. Баранов Б. Н. Социальные сети // Управление. – 2020. – № 2. – С. 12- 14. (Baranov B. N. Social networks // Upravlenie. – 2020. – № 2. – S. 12-14.)
19. Овчинникова Н. С., Паль Д. Р. Социальные сети. История. URL: https://seclgroup.ru/vse-o-soczialnyh-setyah-vliyanie-na-chelovekachas-1/ (дата обращения: 19.10.2021). (Ovchinnikova N. S., Pal D. R. Social network. History. URL: https://seclgroup.ru/vse-o-soczialnyhsetyah-vliyanie-na-cheloveka-chast-1 (data оbrasheniya: 19.10.2021).)
20. Кошкин А. П., Мельков С. А. Герой в России: кто он? (анализируя современный кинематограф) // Национальные и образовательные проблемы гражданской защиты. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 83-90. (Koshkin A. P., Melkov S. A. Hero in Russia: who is he? (analyzing modern cinema) // Nacional’nye i obrazovatel’nye problemy grazhdanskoj zashhity. – 2010. – № 1. – S. 83-90.)
21. Irwin W. Terminator and Philosophy: I’ll be back, therefore I am. – New- York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. – 359 p
Review
For citations:
Kasparyan K.V., Rutkovskaya M.V., Linets A.S. Evolution of the display of high technologies and social networks in the «terminator» universe in 1984-2022. Philosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C). 2022;(2):33-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2022.2.3