How personal data problem changes ethics of artificial intelligence?
https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2020.1.3
Abstract
The article analyzes the impact of the problem of personal data on the discussion of the ethical aspects of artificial intelligence. The concept of artificial intelligence ethics of the USA, China, the European Union and Australia is analyzed. The general principles and problems of forming ethical commissions for conducting an ethical examination of artificial intelligence systems have been identified. It is shown that at present, the decisive role in conducting a humanitarian assessment is provided by representatives of the business community and government. At the same time, civil society institutions have great potential to influence decision-making in this area. The problems of protecting the confidentiality of information, the possibilities of informed consent and ensuring the safety of users are considered. It is shown that the openness of society, intensifying as a result of the introduction of new media and artificial intelligence systems, is two-sided, and naturally limits the possibilities of building a totalitarian state.
References
1. Большие данные в социальных и гуманитарных науках: Сб. обзоров и рефератов / РАН. ИНИОН. Центр науч.-информ. исслед. по науке, образованию и технологиям; отв. ред. Гребенщикова Е. Г. М., 2019. 193 с.
2. ÓhÉigeartaigh, S. S. Overcoming Barriers to Cross-cultural Cooperation in AI Ethics and Governance / Seán S. ÓhÉigeartaigh, Jess Whittlestone, Yang Liu, Yi Zeng, Zhe Liu // Philosophy &. Technology. 2020. Vol. 33. URL: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13347-020- 00402-x.pdf.
3. Klenk, M. How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values? / Philosophy &. Technology. 2020. URL: https://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y#citeas.
4. Bone, J. The social sciences and the web: From «lurking» to interdisciplinary «big data» research / Bone J., Emele Ch., Abdul A., Coghill G., Pang Wei / Methodological innovations. 2016. Vol. 9. P. 1-14.
5. AI Ethics Principles / Australian Government, Department of Industry, Science. URL: https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/ building-australias-artificial-intelligence-capability/ai-ethics-framework/ ai-ethics-principles.
6. Beijing AI Principles. URL: https://www.baai.ac.cn/news/beijing-ai-principles-en.html.
7. On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf.
8. UNESCO. Report of Comest on Robotics Ethics. URL: https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253952.
9. Defense Innovation Board. Recommendations. URL: https://innovation. defense.gov/Recommendations.
10. Cowls J., Floridi L. Prolegomena to a White Paper on an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society. Препринт SSRN, 2018. URL: https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3198732.
11. Ochigame R. The invention of «ethical AI»: how big tech manipulates academia to avoid regulation // The Intercept. 2019. URL: https://theintercept.com/2019/12/20/mit-ethical-ai-artificial-intelligence.
12. Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix - University - Industry - Government Relations: a Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development / H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff // EASST Review. 1995. No. 14. P. 14-19.
13. Chorzempa M. China’s social credit system: a mark of progress or a threat to privacy? / M. Chorzempa, P. Triolo, S. Sacks // Policy Briefs PB 18-14, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2018. URL: https://www. piie.com/system/files/documents/pb18-14.pdf.
14. Botsman R. Big data meets Big Brother as China moves to rate its citizens // Wired. 2017. URL: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-credit-score-privacy-invasion.
15. Contract for the Web. URL: https://9nrane41lq4966uwmljcfggv-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Contract-for-the-Web-3. pdf.
16. Andrejevic M. ISpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2007. 325 p.
17. Brandeis L. D. Other People’s Money: And how the Bankers Use it. New York: F. A. Stokes, 1914. 223 p.
Review
For citations:
Yastreb N.A. How personal data problem changes ethics of artificial intelligence? Philosophical Problems of IT & Cyberspace (PhilIT&C). 2020;(1):29-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2020.1.3
Views:
229
Email this article 